Liberty University Press C. s. lewis as philosopher: truth, goodness, and beauty (2nd edition), paperback/david baggett

• 3 stele, bazat pe 1 voturi

Contributor(s):Author: David Baggett Author: Gary R.

Habermas Author: Jerry L.

Walls It has been nearly ten years since David Baggett, Gary R.

Habermas, and Jerry L.

Walls introduced the first edition of C.

Lewis as Philosopher: Truth, Goodness, and Beauty.

That decade has seen only growing interest in the philosophical aspects of Lewis's work.

What at the time seemed to us to be a rather novel approach to Lewis has become much more common, unsurprising because by both training and temperament Lewis often exhibited the earmarks of a first-rate philosophical mind.

It was likely his amazing and eclectic range of interests and talents that concealed his philosophical acumen.

We have intentionally added five major new chapters to the second edition that contribute to a fuller picture of Lewis the philosopher.

Our goal remains not to cover all the traditional areas of philosophy, but to show more intentionally some of the rich insights of Lewis's writing that reveal aspects of philosophy and the human condition that, too often in contemporary times, go unaddressed, or at least under-addressed.

For example, Bruce Reichenbach has written an epistemology essay that reveals the way Lewis recognized some aspects of knowledge that often go overlooked.

Among such features of knowledge are the ways in which it is perspectival, value-laden, and personal, but without any of these aspects of knowing detracting from objective truth or the propriety of deeply held convictions.

Another example is Will Honeycutt's chapter that discusses Lewis's penetrating engagement with various pagan myths.

Rather than gravitating toward a simple disassociationist model in which there is only or primarily a disconnect or dissonance between Christianity and the pagan myth stories, Honeycutt reveals the way Lewis had the mind of both a philosopher and a poet, a logician and a classicist.

One of Lewis's most important and repeated apologetic arguments went unaddressed in the first edition, and we came to.