'Fantastic' not only means ' amazing'.
It is that hesitation between belief and disbelief in the supernatural.
'Uncanny' is supernatural ignored.
'Marvelous' is supernatural accepted.
Fantastic questions the nature of reality.
So, storyteller cannot lie, and must pass test of truth.
True stories chose storyteller, and best judge of truth is the criminal court.
Fantastic true stories cannot be written.
They just happen as criminal nonsense, and appear before Court.
Now Judge must decide: Can supernatural exist in mainstream? Is this a fool of a doctor who risked jail in order to write nonsense? Is this a Marvelous comedy about progressing our mind into foreknowing, or, is it Uncanny offensive ramble and rant without any head or tail? Good or Hood? Witch or bitch? Genius or Hoodlum? So, was he able to judge?About the AuthorThe Indian doctor could be the first person in the world to have proved in criminal court with evidence before Australian judge that dreams show future.
She took the risk of three years of imprisonment, in order to write literary nonsense around that.
| Decide | Can supernatural exist in mainstream |
|---|
