Description Many philosophers believe they can gain knowledge about the world from the comfort of their armchairs, simply by reflecting on the nature of things.
But how can the mind arrive at substantive knowledge of the world without seeking its input? Michael Strevens proposes an original defense of the armchair pursuit of philosophical knowledge, focusing on the method of cases, in which judgments about category membership--Does this count as causation? Does that count as.
Belknap Press Thinking off your feet: how empirical psychology vindicates armchair philosophy, hardcover/michael strevens
